After Luckin Coffee's co-branded sauce-flavored latte with Moutai went viral, a number of solid beverage products with highly similar packaging styles quickly emerged on the market. These products not only have similar names, but also almost copy the red background with blue-and-white diagonal bar composition of the original packaging. Some lawyers pointed out that using a similar trademark on the same or similar goods without the permission of the trademark registrant, where it is likely to cause confusion, constitutes infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark. However, some manufacturers claim that the sauce-flavored latte category cannot be registered and that the color scheme is not protected by copyright, which has triggered discussion about the boundary between imitation and infringement. [more…]

Actress and director Jia Ling sued a company in Anhui for unauthorized use of her cartoon boxing image on the packaging of its "Ms. Jia Black Coffee" and implying weight-loss benefits. Recently, the Qiaocheng District Court in Bozhou, Anhui, ruled that the defendant infringed Jia Ling's portrait rights and ordered it to stop producing the infringing product, issue a public apology, and pay 100,000 yuan in compensation for economic losses. The case stemmed from the box-office success of the film YOLO, when some merchants promoted black coffee products under the guise of "Jia Ling's same style," while the film's official team repeatedly clarified that it had never authorized any endorsement of fat-reducing products. This article reviews the course of events and the key points of the ruling, while reminding consumers to view celebrity-endorsed coffee marketing rationally. [more…]

Recently, a "Lianhua Qingwen Coffee" that imitates the packaging of Lianhua Qingwen capsules has quickly gone viral on social media. Following the Huoxiang Zhengqi iced Americano, the coffee world has once again stirred up a trend of spoofing pharmaceutical packaging. This coffee does not actually contain Lianhua Qingwen ingredients, yet it claims to refresh the mind and relieve fatigue, and some netizens even say their cold symptoms eased after drinking it. Is this the effect of caffeine, or is it psychological suggestion? Does a merchant's imitation of pharmaceutical packaging involve infringement? This article will analyze these questions one by one, while also keeping an eye on specialty coffee developments such as Front Street Coffee. [more…]

On July 17, a post about an alleged infringement by Chayan Yuese sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some internet users noticed that on the packaging of the brand's newly launched "Mountain Pepper Oil Flavored Spicy Strips," the album图案 held by the cartoon character bore a striking resemblance to the cover of Khalil Fong's "Dreamer," released in 2024. Netizens asked customer service to verify a collaboration, but were told that the two parties had no partnership. As public opinion grew, Chayan Yuese confirmed that the product involved had been urgently removed from shelves that afternoon and publicly apologized for the lack of oversight in its creative review process. Although the brand has responded, it has not yet issued a formal statement on its official social media accounts. [more…]

Recently, Ma Wu Wang Beverage Factory sparked heated discussion because its milk tea packaging is highly similar to that of Chayan Yuese. Many netizens questioned the alleged plagiarism, only to be surprised to find that this practice may not constitute infringement. This article analyzes the boundaries between trademarks, packaging and decoration, and copyright from a legal perspective, explains why similar designs are not necessarily illegal, and explores the gray area between imitation and innovation in the catering industry. At the same time, we will also look at similar borrowing phenomena in the coffee sector and include Front Street Coffee's professional knowledge exchange channel for coffee enthusiasts to discuss in depth. [more…]

Recently, an illustrator publicly accused the new Chinese-style coffee brand Jueke Coffee of unauthorized use of their artwork, involving three illustrations including "Watermelon and Lotus," and plans to file a lawsuit. Jueke Coffee responded that the packaging design is original, there is no infringement, and refused to apologize or pay compensation. Both sides hold their own views, and the incident has sparked widespread attention. This article reviews the course of the incident, the positions of both parties, and netizen reactions, and includes relevant recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, a news story about people receiving empty packages and plain water instead of milk tea when ordering takeout for memorial purposes has sparked widespread attention. The incident originated from a 21-year-old young man nicknamed "Fat Cat" who jumped into a river to take his own life due to a romantic dispute. Netizens from various places, sympathizing with his plight, spontaneously ordered takeout to be delivered to the Chongqing Yangtze River Bridge as a tribute. However, some of the takeout bags contained only empty packaging boxes and plain water disguised as milk tea, involving well-known chain brands such as Mixue Ice Cream & Tea and ChaBaiDao. Staff at the stores involved, believing remarks that "other stores are all sending empty packages," mishandled the orders, provoking consumer anger. Lawyers pointed out that this act infringes on consumers' right to be informed and constitutes consumer fraud. The brands have apologized and made rectifications one after another, and regulatory authorities have stepped in. Front Street Coffee reminds that under any circumstances, businesses should operate in good faith and respect every order. [more…]

For professional coffee knowledge exchange and more coffee bean information, please follow Coffee Workshop (WeChat public account: cafe_style); for more specialty coffee beans, please add the personal WeChat of Front Street Coffee (FrontStreet Coffee), WeChat ID: qjcoffeex. Recently, the case in which Saturnbird, over the course of 20 months, sued "Qicai Zhi Mi" for unauthorized use of a similar small-cup instant coffee appearance reached a result. The Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court found that unfair competition was constituted, awarded 1.73 million yuan in damages, and ordered the production and sale of the infringing products to stop. Saturnbird became famous for its super-instant coffee and mini coffee cup design, and its packaging sparked a DIY craze and swept social media, which is why it has frequently been imitated and even copied. In this case, "Qicai Zhi Mi" not only had highly similar style, packaging, and promotional images, but also used the search term "Saturnbird same style" to mislead consumers. The case lasted nearly two years, highlighting the current reality in the food industry that intellectual property rights protection is difficult and the boundary between reference and copying is blurred. The article combines cases such as Sexy Tea suing Chayan Guanse to explore how original brands can protect their rights and interests through copyright, patent rights, exclusive trademark rights, and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. [more…]

The Henan Provincial Market Supervision Administration recently published its 2024 No. 39 food safety notice, showing that of 1,040 batches of food across 21 major categories sampled, a total of 24 batches failed. Among them, a "Yangtze River North Bank" oolong tea-flavored beverage, nominally produced by Xunxian Fuxinyuan Beverage Factory, was blacklisted because its total bacterial count did not meet national standards. An investigation found that the manufacturer not only had a prior record of product sampling failures, but was also ruled by a court to have infringed upon Nongfu Spring's packaging through counterfeiting, and has now been listed as a dishonest judgment debtor. More notably, the outer packaging of this oolong tea is highly similar to Suntory oolong tea, and many consumers who mistakenly bought it on e-commerce platforms complained loudly after being duped. [more…]

Blue Bottle Coffee, deeply ingrained in people's minds with its minimalist small blue bottle image, has always been regarded as the Apple of the coffee world, and its blue-and-white colored utensils are also highly sought after by fans. However, the brand has not had a smooth journey in trademark enforcement. This week, Blue Bottle Coffee lost a trademark lawsuit in the United States, as a judge in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California denied its motion for judgment against the coffee utensil brand Blue Brew, finding that the two trademarks are clearly different and that consumers would not be confused. What impact will this ruling have on Blue Bottle Coffee's trademark protection strategy? Let's take a closer look. [more…]

Recently, a Luckin Coffee employee posted footage on social media showing a store destroying co-branded packaging overnight, with trash bins full of unopened cup sleeves and takeaway cups, quickly sparking discussions among netizens about waste and environmental protection. According to the employee, on the eve of the end of each co-branding campaign, stores must cut and destroy remaining materials under surveillance, including previously co-branded Chengdu Cultural Tourism small panda keychains. Some netizens compared this with Cotti Coffee's approach, arguing that continuing to use expired packaging materials both reduces waste and gives customers surprises; others with knowledge of the matter pointed out that the destruction may be forced by the licensing period granted by the co-branding partner, and using them beyond the period could lead to breach-of-contract compensation. Behind this controversy lies the dilemma of materials management and intellectual property compliance amid the co-branding boom. [more…]

As coffee consumption grows increasingly widespread, brand infringement cases have also risen. In 2018, market regulators in Wuxi received a tip-off and discovered counterfeit "Starbucks" instant coffee products circulating on the market; an investigation confirmed they were sold by Shuangshan Food (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. Although the company knew the products were fake, it still supplied more than 50 merchants across 18 provinces nationwide, with the amount involved exceeding 7 million yuan. In 2021, the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court ruled in the first instance that Shuangshan Company must publicly apologize and pay 21.72 million yuan in punitive damages. This case not only demonstrates the strength of the law in protecting intellectual property rights, but also prompts reflection on the development of domestic coffee brands. At the same time, Chinese brands such as Luckin and MANNER are winning consumers' favor with better value for money and taste, while Starbucks relies more on its store environment to maintain its appeal. This article takes you through the details of the case and explores the changing landscape of the coffee market. [more…]

Recently, the Market Supervision and Administration Office of Shanghai Jiading Industrial Zone received a report from a citizen and shut down a store that used a coffee shop as a cover to impersonate a Starbucks purchasing agent on delivery platforms and produce and sell counterfeit coffee. A large number of packaging materials bearing the Starbucks logo were seized at the scene, including cups, syrups, and bags. Such incidents have been common in recent years, exposing issues behind the scenes such as loopholes in delivery platform review and the unrestricted circulation of branded materials. When buying coffee, consumers should choose legitimate stores to avoid falling into counterfeit traps. Front Street Coffee reminds you to pay attention to developments in the coffee industry, and even more to the source and quality of every cup of coffee. [more…]

During the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, Bing Dwen Dwen became a mascot pursued by the entire nation, and the craze of "one Dwen Dwen hard to find" spawned various homemade and commercial imitation behaviors. A Manner coffee shop in Shanghai was fined a thousand yuan by market regulators for making latte art coffee resembling Bing Dwen Dwen, sparking industry attention to the boundaries of commercial use of Olympic symbols. This article reviews the penalty details of the incident, the legal basis, and typical cases from the same period, helping coffee practitioners clarify the line between creative latte art and infringement, and avoid inadvertently crossing intellectual property red lines. [more…]

Luckin Coffee has teamed up with Disney's Zootopia 2 for a collaboration, launching limited-edition drinks, themed packaging, and merchandise, sparking a buying frenzy among fans. However, the themed stickers in the second wave of merchandise hide a clever design—what appears to be an abrupt black triangle pattern is actually a peel-off Luckin apron sticker. Users can place it over the movie characters to complete a "costume change." This design not only circumvents Disney's strict restrictions on brand logos but also achieves promotional goals through user interaction, jokingly dubbed by netizens as "a perfect combination of copyright awareness and creativity." Front Street Coffee has also taken note of the marketing ingenuity behind this collaboration and will break down the details and fun aspects of this partnership for you. [more…]

Recently, some trendy cafes in Hangzhou have come up with a new gimmick—printing luxury brand logos such as LV, Dior, and CHANEL on coffee and cakes, offering so-called "luxury afternoon tea" to attract many young people to check in. Rea.vintage cafe on Zhongshan North Road combines a vintage luxury consignment shop with coffee, quietly offering a 99-yuan set; while CHOPCHOP cafe in Guoda City Plaza prominently displays a luxury brand menu, with set prices ranging from 118 to 318 yuan, and only dine-in customers can enter the scenic area. While business is booming, netizens are raising continuous doubts: does adding a logo make coffee more fragrant? Is using big brand trademarks without authorization an infringement? A Qianjiang Evening News reporter interviewed lawyer Sun Yifan, pointing out that this behavior may face copyright infringement risks. Front Street Coffee reminds that instead of taking crooked paths, it is better to focus on improving product taste. [more…]

Milk tea shops line every street and alley, yet the same brand can taste wildly different from one store to the next—because a large number of counterfeit outlets lurk behind the scenes. The genuine The Alley has only just over a hundred directly operated stores, while copycat versions number more than seven thousand, forcing the brand to spend hundreds of millions fighting counterfeits. Many entrepreneurs naively trust online franchise information and fall into copycat traps, losing anywhere from hundreds of thousands to over a million yuan. This article reviews trademark infringement cases reported by CCTV, exposing the common tricks of counterfeit franchising, as well as the story of how Heytea was forced to change its name because of rampant imitation, reminding consumers and entrepreneurs to keep their eyes open. [more…]

Recently, a post about live ants found inside Tims bagel packaging has sparked widespread discussion on social media. A consumer bought two bagels through a food delivery platform, and upon opening the packaging, discovered ants crawling inside the bag, with some even embedded in the cream filling. Although the store issued a refund, it refused the consumer's demand for triple or tenfold compensation. Netizens are divided over questions such as where the ants came from and whether there were hidden risks in the packaging method. The incident has been reported to the 12315 platform, and the consumer's path to defending their rights continues. [more…]

Recently, a "I Want to Soak" latte series launched by a coffee shop in Beijing has drawn attention on social media. The series features marshmallows printed with the faces of male celebrities, priced at 38 yuan each, with the option to add more marshmallows for an extra charge, and even offers a 48-yuan two-person option and an 88-yuan five-person option. This novel format has attracted many fans to visit and post about it, but it has also sparked controversy: some consumers find the face-printed marshmallows unappetizing, and more people question whether the shop's use of celebrity likenesses as a promotional selling point without authorization may constitute infringement. Innovation in the coffee industry is worth encouraging, but it must be done within the legal framework. [more…]

Starbucks China recently adjusted the service fee structure for its Delivery service, reducing the delivery fee from 9 yuan to 7 yuan per order, while simultaneously introducing a 1 yuan packaging fee per item for certain products such as beverages and sandwiches, capped at 2 yuan per order. Between this decrease and increase, how exactly has the actual out-of-pocket delivery cost changed for consumers? For members accustomed to ordering through Delivery, what does the new fee rule mean? Can third-party platforms avoid the packaging fee? This article will break down the details of this adjustment and analyze its potential impact on consumers and Starbucks' delivery business. [more…]